The book ”Reading the Rabbit: Explorations in Warner Bros. But the brief discussion about Elmer Fudd losing his gun speaks to the current state of child animation and where the industry heads next when creating cartoons and productions for children. We may forget the argument in days ahead. Did it represent the movement to eliminate guns from our culture? Or was it just about making a safer show for kids? Critics wondered if the show was pro- or anti-gun. But “Looney Tunes” has rarely been a cartoon for children.įor a brief moment, “Looney Tunes” joined the culture war. That might seem like an odd comment about a cartoon for children. Elmer Fudd won’t use a gun in the new ‘Looney Tunes’ series.Maybe they’ll come out packaged for an Adult Swim type of thing.” “Some of them have maybe gone a little too far, so they might come out in a different format. For example, the new series shows a moment where Porky sucks snake venom out of Daffy’s leg. People wondered why the character would be without his iconic weapon, especially since the new cartoon shorts include a number of other mature moments by “Looney Tunes” standards. This brief moment sparked conversation on social media and in national headlines. You could argue that’s also a violent weapon, assuming Fudd is supposed to cut away at the rabbit if and when he catches him. It features a large curved blade at the end of a short handle. Instead, Elmer Fudd embraces the scythe, a tool that cuts crops like grass and wheat. “But, we can do cartoony violence - TNT, the Acme stuff.
Peter Browngardt, the executive producer of the new “Looney Tunes” cartoon shorts on the HBO Max streaming service, told The New York Times that Fudd won’t have his traditional weapon in the new version. Why did animators take away the gun? Gun violence. Gone is his extended musket, or what was essentially a hunter’s rifle. SALT LAKE CITY - Elmer Fudd is still chasing the silly wabbit.
0 kommentar(er)
